This is not the first time Adobe Stock has faced criticism over generative AI. In June, a group of contributors claimed that Adobe trained its Firefly model on their stock images without express notification or consent. They argued that the influx of AI-generated images into Adobe Stock is cannibalizing the platform. Adobe responded by stating that it respects the rights of third parties and requires all Stock contributors to comply with their terms, including those specific to the use of generative AI tools.
Key takeaways:
- Adobe responded to a controversy over an AI-generated stock image of a Gaza explosion that was used without being labeled as AI-generated.
- Adobe Stock requires all generative AI content to be labeled as such when submitted for licensing and is committed to fighting misinformation through the Content Authenticity Initiative.
- Adobe Stock, known for providing high-quality curated and royalty-free photos, videos, and other assets, is less known for editorial imagery compared to its competitor Getty Images.
- This is not the first time Adobe Stock has faced issues around generative AI, with contributors previously alleging that Adobe trained its Firefly model on their stock images without express notification or consent.