The divide between iPhone and iPad app charts suggests that AI-focused apps are more appealing to mass-market users rather than traditional creatives. Many AI apps exploit in-app charges to appear in the free category, a tactic reminiscent of mobile gaming strategies. While AI tools are popular, their appeal diminishes when users must pay, indicating a preference for removing financial barriers rather than skill barriers in creative tasks.
Key takeaways:
```html
- Generative AI apps are dominating the App Store charts across various categories, but many are low-quality and exploit the hype with misleading features and high subscription fees.
- HUBX, a Turkish app developer, has multiple AI apps in the top rankings, but they receive negative feedback for poor performance and customer service.
- While some AI-focused apps like Photoroom and Picsart AI offer decent features, the market is saturated, making it difficult to find quality apps.
- The popularity of AI apps is more pronounced on iPhones than iPads, suggesting that traditional users still prefer established tools over AI-driven alternatives.