The author also expresses concern about the rapid pace of AI development, suggesting that it may be prioritizing speed over sustainability and ethical considerations. The article cites fears expressed by industry leaders about the potential negative consequences of AI. The author argues for a more measured approach to AI development, emphasizing the need for sustainability, ecological viability, and social justice, in line with Schumacher's ethical-economic framework.
Key takeaways:
- The article discusses the difference between cleverness and wisdom in the context of AI, using E.F. Schumacher's definitions where cleverness refers to technical and analytical capabilities and wisdom involves deeper understanding and respect for the natural world and moral considerations.
- Current AI technology, such as LLMs, are seen as clever but not wise, as they can perform complex tasks but lack deeper understanding or ethical considerations in their output.
- There are concerns about the rapid pace of AI development, with fears that the technology could have unforeseen negative consequences. The author suggests that a more cautious and sustainable approach to AI development is needed.
- The article concludes by questioning whether AI technologists will heed these warnings and strive for wisdom in their creations, rather than just cleverness.