The article argues that the development of AGI is a deeply political issue and criticizes the lack of public debate and democratic input in its development. It suggests that the potential risks of AGI, including mass unemployment, economic disruption, and even the extinction of humanity, warrant a more cautious and democratic approach. The article also highlights the growing distrust of tech executives and skepticism towards the idea that tech progress is inherently positive.
Key takeaways:
- A new poll reveals that 63 percent of American voters believe regulation should aim to actively prevent the development of AI superintelligence.
- Despite this, major AI companies like OpenAI are actively working to build superintelligent AI, or artificial general intelligence (AGI), which they believe should exist for the benefit of humanity.
- However, there is increasing distrust among Americans towards tech executives and the notion that tech progress is inherently positive, especially given the potential risks associated with AGI, such as mass unemployment and drastic changes to the world order.
- The development of AGI is viewed as a deeply political move, with calls for more democratic input and oversight in its creation and implementation.