In their response, the authors, a webcomic duo, express their preference for AI tools that assist with administrative tasks rather than creative ones. They criticize the Muse platform for promoting derivative content and devaluing creative work. They hope for a shift towards more inclusive, artist-focused approaches in the industry. They conclude by promoting their Patreon page for supporters to access exclusive content.
Key takeaways:
- The authors express concern about the hype around AI, particularly generative AI, which they believe is damaging creative work and energy.
- An email from an AI company, Muse, proposes a collaboration to promote their product that generates content automatically, which the authors decline.
- The authors argue that the rise of AI has been built on the work of creatives without proper compensation or acknowledgment, and that social media platforms thrive on original content created by people, but creators have not been fairly rewarded.
- They believe that storytelling is personal and cannot be outsourced to AI, and that artists would benefit more from AI tools that assist with administrative tasks rather than creative ones.