Instead of regulating AI model development, Howard suggests alternative approaches such as supporting open-source development, focusing on regulating AI applications, promoting transparency and collaboration, and investing in AI expertise. He believes that by adopting these alternative approaches, California can ensure the safe and beneficial advancement of AI technology without stifling innovation or undermining the state’s leadership in AI.
Key takeaways:
- Jeremy Howard, CEO of Answer.AI, expresses concerns over bill SB-1047, arguing that it could potentially harm open-source developers, small businesses, and innovation within the AI sector.
- Howard argues that the bill's broad definitions, restrictive requirements, and potential legal repercussions could discourage open-source development and hinder AI advancements.
- He suggests that the proposed regulations could create significant barriers for small businesses and startups, stifering innovation and concentrating power within established corporations.
- Howard proposes alternative approaches, such as supporting open-source development, focusing on regulating AI applications rather than development, promoting transparency and collaboration, and investing in AI expertise within government agencies.