Sign up to save tools and stay up to date with the latest in AI
bg
bg
1

Answering Legal Questions with LLMs

Apr 29, 2024 - hugodutka.com
The article discusses the limitations of using ChatGPT for legal questions and the steps taken by Hotseat to improve its functionality. The team at Hotseat found that while ChatGPT could identify subquestions well, it often failed to answer them correctly. To address this, they divided complex tasks into simpler ones, improving the reasoning capabilities of the language model. However, the system still had limitations, including high latency, faulty reasoning, and the inability to process more than one document at a time.

Despite these limitations, the team believes the underlying architecture can be generalized to other problems. They are now focusing on developing a semantic search that can help law firms navigate through thousands of legal documents. The team is also seeking a co-founder to help build a meaningful product in the legal tech space.

Key takeaways:

  • The team at Hotseat attempted to improve the reasoning capabilities of ChatGPT for legal questions by breaking down complex tasks into simpler subtasks.
  • Despite improvements, the system still has limitations including high latency, faulty reasoning, and the inability to process more than one document at a time.
  • The system was tested with dozens of lawyers, with a GDPR specialist rating 8 out of 10 responses as excellent.
  • While the system is not yet useful for lawyers, the underlying architecture could be generalized to other problems and used to answer arbitrary questions about arbitrary documents.
View Full Article

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!