The author, who identifies as frugal, admits to a conflict between their actions and the premise of their question. They express uncertainty about the concept of the singularity, comparing it to a religious belief. Ultimately, they conclude that the most rational approach is to continue being frugal, even if it only provides an illusion of control over their future.
Key takeaways:
- The author questions the need for frugality if the singularity, a hypothetical future point when technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, is near.
- They argue that if the singularity is indeed close, it might be more beneficial to live lavishly now, as money might not matter in a post-scarcity economy.
- However, they also acknowledge that there are practical reasons to save money, such as the possibility that the singularity might not occur, or that some resources might still be scarce even in a post-scarcity economy.
- The author concludes by stating that they continue to be frugal, despite their doubts about the future, as a way of maintaining control over their life.