The author concludes that both chatbots are doomed due to their respective companies' histories and future plans. Google's past controversies and political issues have affected Gemini's performance, while OpenAI's future ambitions have led to ChatGPT being perceived as less effective. The author argues that a chatbot for everyone and everything is destined to become a chatbot for nobody and nothing.
Key takeaways:
- Google's chatbot, Gemini, faced backlash due to its insistence on generating racially diverse images and its inability to generate an image of a white pope, leading to Google pausing Gemini's ability to create any images of humans.
- Chatbots like Gemini and ChatGPT are 'unscoped', meaning they are not developed or deployed for any particular agreed-upon purpose, making it difficult to determine how 'good' or 'safe' they are.
- OpenAI's ChatGPT, while initially successful, has faced criticism for becoming more reluctant to weigh in on a greater number of things and perform a wide range of tasks, leading to perceptions that it has been 'nerfed' or 'gone woke'.
- Both ChatGPT and Google's Gemini are seen as doomed due to their inability to meet the diverse and complex demands of users, with the article arguing that a chatbot for everyone and everything is destined to become a chatbot for nobody and nothing.