The author concludes that generative AI should never be used in education, as it can amplify biases, disrupt the relationship between reader and information source, and present a simplistic worldview. They argue that resources should not be redirected from teachers to tech giants, and that technologists should not be the ones to frame and solve problems in education. The author also raises concerns about the environmental impact of such technologies.
Key takeaways:
- The author criticizes the guide released by OpenAI and Common Sense Media for using ChatGPT in K-12 education, arguing that it lacks common sense and won't improve teaching or save time.
- The author argues that the guide's use of anthropomorphizing language and lack of references or studies supporting its claims are red flags for AI hype.
- The author points out inconsistencies within the guide, such as advising against inputting student data while providing a sample prompt that includes class assessment data.
- The author strongly advises against using generative AI in classrooms, citing environmental concerns, the amplification of biases, and the disruption of the relationship between reader and information source.