Research from Israel's Bar-Ilan University suggests that people may be less likely to accept AI-generated messages as they are perceived as less genuine. Experts advise users to customize AI-written drafts with their speech patterns to enhance authenticity. Meanwhile, a study by Boston Consulting Group (BCG) found that while generative AI like OpenAI's GPT-4 performed better in creative tasks, it fared worse in corporate problem-solving tasks, highlighting the need for caution when using AI in situations requiring definitive answers.
Key takeaways:
- The use of generative AI like OpenAI's ChatGPT for emotionally charged texts such as eulogies and wedding vows is increasing, but it raises questions about authenticity and moral validity.
- Research from Bar-Ilan University suggests that people may be less likely to accept AI-generated apologies or other sensitive messages, as they are perceived as less genuine.
- Despite concerns, some users and experts argue that AI tools like ChatGPT can be helpful, especially for less-fluent writers, and that the quality of the output depends on the user's involvement and effort.
- While AI can improve productivity and perform well in creative tasks, it cannot replace human traits like resilience, creativity, and humility, and it may perform poorly in tasks involving corporate problem-solving.