Sign up to save tools and stay up to date with the latest in AI
bg
bg
1

Comparing OpenAI’s Assistants API, Custom GPTs, and Chat Completion API - Revelry

Dec 07, 2023 - news.bensbites.co
The article discusses the pros and cons of different OpenAI APIs for integrating generative AI into custom software applications. The author compares the Chat Completion API, Assistants API, and Custom GPTs, highlighting that while the Assistants API offers a range of features, it also locks users further into OpenAI and is more complex to implement. The Chat Completions API is simpler and faster, but doesn't support RAG or prompt management out of the box. Custom GPTs are easy to build and can be published for others to use, but give users less control and data ownership.

The author also discusses the concept of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and the benefits of building your own RAG flow. They argue that having control over the text chunking, embedding models, vector database querying, and results injection into prompts can be more beneficial than relying on OpenAI's black box solutions. The author concludes by inviting readers to share their experiences with generative AI and offers their services for integrating AI into custom software systems.

Key takeaways:

  • OpenAI offers several options for utilizing their LLMs, including the Chat Completion API, Assistants API, and Custom GPTs, each with their own pros and cons.
  • The Assistants API is a good option for teams wanting to integrate their software with OpenAI's models but it further locks you into OpenAI and doesn't support streaming or web browsing.
  • The Chat Completions API is a simpler, faster option that doesn't lock you into OpenAI but doesn't support RAG or prompt management out of the box.
  • Custom GPTs are easy to set up and publish, and support web browsing and image generation, but you have little control over how it works and only people with Chat GPT Plus subscriptions can use it.
View Full Article

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!