The author also explores the commercial aspect of AI in literature, noting that the development of AI technologies is expensive and reliant on funding from wealthy investors. She suggests that the use of AI in literature could lead to a homogenization of writing styles and a loss of literary diversity. Despite these concerns, the author acknowledges the potential of AI to democratize creative writing, allowing more people to become storytellers. However, she emphasizes the need for a balance between the benefits of AI and preserving human creativity in literature.
Key takeaways:
- The author explores the potential and limitations of AI in writing, sharing her personal experiences with OpenAI's text generator, GPT-3.
- AI writing tools, while capable of producing coherent and sometimes profound sentences, lack the individual perspective and consciousness that human writers bring to their work.
- There are concerns about the ethical implications of AI writing, including the lack of consent in training, the reinforcement of bias, and the potential for corporate capture of human language.
- Despite the limitations and ethical concerns, some see AI as a tool that could democratize creative writing, allowing anyone to generate the narratives they want.