The article also reviews several proposed acts, including the NO FAKES Act, the NO AI FRAUD Act, the DEFIANCE Act, and the TAKE IT DOWN Act. Holland criticizes the first two for focusing on the interests of celebrities and wealthy individuals and for potentially creating harmful intellectual property rights. The DEFIANCE Act is endorsed for treating all NCIC equally, but Holland argues it is not enough on its own. The TAKE IT DOWN Act is seen as having potential, but its focus on criminalization is criticized. Holland calls for investment in education and consent culture, and for legislation that prioritizes the needs of those most harmed by NCIC.
Key takeaways:
- The article highlights the need for a human rights framework to address Non-Consensual Intimate Content (NCIC), especially for marginalized communities, youth, and everyday people.
- Current legislative proposals, such as the NO FAKES and NO AI FRAUD Acts, are criticized for focusing too much on celebrities and wealthy individuals, while ignoring the majority of those who will be harmed by NCIC.
- The author argues that Congress should focus on the issue of consent, regardless of whether AI is used or not, and calls for meaningful data privacy protections to prevent tech companies from profiting from endangering abuse survivors.
- The article endorses the DEFIANCE Act, which allows victims to sue abusers who share NCIC, but criticizes the TAKE IT DOWN Act for its focus on criminalization rather than education and building better social norms about consent.