Chegg's lawsuit is part of a broader trend of companies suing Google over alleged intellectual property misappropriation, though its use of the Sherman Act is a novel approach. The company emphasizes the value of its educational content for AI applications and claims that Google's actions particularly impact its business. Google, in response, stated that it sends billions of clicks to websites daily and that AI Overviews increase traffic diversity. As of January 2025, there have been 38 copyright lawsuits related to AI in the U.S., with mixed outcomes.
Key takeaways:
- Chegg has sued Google, claiming that Google's "AI Overviews" hurt its traffic and revenue by republishing content without permission.
- Chegg accuses Google of abusing its monopoly position to force companies to supply materials for its AI-generated answers, potentially violating antitrust laws.
- Google defends itself by stating that AI Overviews send traffic to a greater diversity of sites and denies any wrongdoing.
- Chegg's lawsuit is part of a broader trend of companies suing over AI-related IP issues, with 38 copyright lawsuits filed in the US as of January 2025.