Sign up to save tools and stay up to date with the latest in AI
bg
bg
1

Even LLMs need education—quality data makes LLMs overperform

Feb 27, 2024 - stackoverflow.blog
The article discusses the cost and efficiency of training large language models (LLMs), highlighting the potential of smaller models to perform better on specific tasks. It mentions the intimidating costs associated with training LLMs, which can reach into the millions or even billions. However, research is being conducted to create smaller models that perform better than larger ones on specific benchmarks. For instance, a dataset of toddler-level stories called TinyStories was used to create models with less than ten million parameters that still produced comprehensible outputs.

The article also emphasizes the importance of quality, targeted data in training LLMs. It cites Microsoft's creation of a targeted dataset for a model optimized to write Python functions from docstrings, which performed as well as models with ten times the number of parameters. The article concludes by suggesting that organizations operating in specialized domains may need to train or fine-tune LLMs with specialized data to understand that domain. It also suggests that smaller, targeted LLMs are not only more cost-effective but also more efficient for inference and fine-tuning.

Key takeaways:

  • There is active research into creating smaller language models that perform better than larger models on specific benchmarks, potentially reducing the intimidating costs associated with training large language models.
  • Researchers have developed a data set of toddler-level stories called TinyStories that can be used to create models of less than ten million parameters that still produce comprehensible outputs.
  • Microsoft researchers have found success in creating targeted datasets for models that perform well on specific tasks, such as writing Python functions from docstrings, demonstrating the value of quality, targeted data.
  • Smaller, targeted language models not only provide more bang for their buck from training costs, but they are also cheaper to run inference and fine-tuning on, making them a potentially more cost-effective choice for many applications.
View Full Article

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!