The author also discusses the potential issues with AI code, including security, reliability, and maintainability concerns, as well as the risk of IP infringement. However, they note that AI code isn't necessarily worse than human-written code and that techniques like audits and documentation protocols can help manage these risks. The author concludes by suggesting that AI code will increasingly become part of the software environment, and that companies should establish rules for identifying and managing it.
Key takeaways:
- JetBrains, a maker of IDEs, has introduced a non-removable AI Assistant plug-in into the daily working lives of developers, which has been criticized as an unwanted new feature.
- This new feature could potentially disrupt developers' workflow and may not be welcomed by companies with strict 'No AI coding' policies.
- AI code in development isn't necessarily worse than human-generated code, but it needs to be properly audited and documented.
- AI code is going to be increasingly part of the environment in which products exist, so setting rules for identifying and managing it is crucial.