The author suggests that the real issue lies in the fact that AI needs 'all' the books and 'all' the websites for training, but not any specific one. The article also touches on the potential of AI in creating original art and the challenges it may pose to platforms like Spotify. The author concludes by drawing a parallel with a historical case of art copying, suggesting that the debate over AI and intellectual property rights is a modern iteration of age-old questions about authenticity and originality.
Key takeaways:
- The advent of AI technology raises new questions about intellectual property rights, particularly when it comes to creating content 'in the style of' existing artists or summarizing news articles.
- While AI models like ChatGPT use vast amounts of data for training, they don't retain the specific content, raising questions about whether this constitutes copyright infringement.
- The value of individual pieces of data is minimal in the grand scheme of AI training, but the collective data is essential, leading to debates about fair use and compensation.
- As AI technology evolves, it's likely to be used to create new and original content, raising further questions about authorship, authenticity, and how we define and value art.