The article compares Google's generative AI model, Gemini, and OpenAI's ChatGPT by asking them 10 questions and evaluating their responses. Gemini was found to be more adept at answering questions related to current events and identifying AI-generated images, but it refused to answer questions about sex and politics and made some factual errors. On the other hand, ChatGPT was more conversational and human-like in its responses, but it struggled with identifying AI-generated images and answering questions about current events due to its data being trained only up to April 2023.
Despite some of Gemini's responses being preferred, the author found interacting with ChatGPT to be a more enjoyable, human-like experience. However, both AI models had their strengths and weaknesses, with Gemini having an edge in current events and planning, and ChatGPT being more human-like and detailed in its responses.
Key takeaways:
Google's Gemini AI model and OpenAI's ChatGPT were compared in a series of 10 questions, with Gemini showing an edge in current events and planning, but also making factual errors.
ChatGPT was found to be more human-like in its responses, but struggled with identifying AI-generated images and providing current information.
Gemini was able to confidently identify AI-generated images and pull up-to-date information from the web, but refused to answer questions about sex and politics.
Despite its strengths, Gemini also made factual errors and was less conversational in tone compared to ChatGPT.
