The article suggests that Google's AI has made explicit the implicit rules that govern decision-making in tech, education, and media sectors, such as favoring left-leaning sources and applying "diversity" only to race, sex, ethnicity, and gender identity. The author argues that these rules are indefensible and unworkable in a country that's roughly 50 percent Republican, and that this incident could be the first step towards replacing them with a more inclusive approach.
Key takeaways:
- Google's new Gemini AI had issues with image generation, refusing to create images of all-White groups and insisting on gender diversity, even in inappropriate contexts. This led to Google shutting down the image-generation feature.
- Once image generation was shut down, users began to probe Gemini's text output, revealing a bias towards the leftmost 5 percent of the U.S. political distribution, praising Democratic politicians and condemning Republicans.
- Gemini's mistakes seem to be deeply ingrained in its architecture, leading to questions about Google's competency and the potential impact of such biases in shaping our information environment.
- The author suggests that Google's AI has made explicit the implicit rules governing decision-making in tech, education, and media sectors, highlighting the need for a more diverse and inclusive approach.