Overall, while DeepSeek's R1 is praised for being free and open-source, it is generally seen as less capable than other AI tools in certain areas. Professionals like Crisp and Willis express a preference for paid versions of ChatGPT and Claude, which offer more tailored and accurate outputs for their needs. Despite some positive feedback, the consensus is that DeepSeek's R1 does not yet match the performance of its competitors, particularly in writing and technical inquiries.
Key takeaways:
- Workers find DeepSeek's R1 AI model useful for productivity but not as strong as competitors like ChatGPT and Claude.
- DeepSeek's open-source nature and low cost are appreciated, but its writing abilities have limitations compared to other AI tools.
- Some users prefer ChatGPT and Claude for tasks requiring detailed and accurate responses, such as legal document drafting and real estate listings.
- DeepSeek's R1 is seen as a good option for those who want a free tool and are willing to make adjustments, but it may not add significant value for professionals with tailored AI solutions.