The author also points out that Humane AI's concept is not new, comparing it to previous scams like Ritot, Cicret, and eyeHand that promised similar technology but failed to deliver. The author concludes by expressing disbelief that Humane AI managed to raise $230 million from investors, attributing it to a combination of ego, poor due diligence, and fear of missing out.
Key takeaways:
- The author is critical of Humane AI's product, a device that uses a laser projector to project on the body, arguing that it is inferior to a good smartphone in terms of processing power and display quality.
- Humane AI's product also faces practical issues such as where to project from, what to project on, and how to deal with ambient light, which significantly affects the contrast of pico projectors.
- The author argues that Humane AI's claim of a 720p resolution is misleading, as the actual resolution delivered is much lower.
- The author suggests that Humane AI's product is a rehash of old scams, such as the wrist projector scams of the past, and criticizes the company for raising $230 million from investors despite these issues.