The author also discusses the rise of AI-powered digital assistants like Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT-4o, which he believes are superior to the Humane AI Pin and the Rabbit R1. He argues that these AI-powered assistants are updated faster and are more accessible, as they can be used on smartphones. The author concludes by expressing his regret for buying the Rabbit R1 and his skepticism about the future of AI devices.
Key takeaways:
- The author expresses regret over purchasing the Rabbit R1, an AI gadget, due to its underwhelming performance and the questionable history of its parent company.
- Rabbit R1 was marketed as a device that could act as a bridge between the user and various services, but many of these promised features are still missing or don't work properly.
- The author suggests that AI-native products like the Rabbit R1 are at a disadvantage compared to AI-powered digital assistants like Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT-4o, which are updated faster and more directly accessible on smartphones.
- The author also raises concerns about Rabbit's alleged origins and its CEO's involvement in a previous project called GAMA, which raised funds for an NFT project that eventually vanished.