The article also differentiates between prompt architecting and fine-tuning. While fine-tuning involves modifying the LLM with a new dataset, prompt architecting leverages the existing LLM without any modification. However, for companies with strict data privacy requirements, such as banks, fine-tuning may be the more appropriate option.
Key takeaways:
- Large Language Models (LLMs) can be tailored to specific data or domain information without modifying the model itself or its training data, by using the right sequence of prompts.
- Building a comprehensive “prompt architecture” is a cost-effective approach to maximize the value extracted from LLMs, enhancing API-powered tools.
- Fine-tuning, which involves retraining a segment of an LLM with a large new dataset, is a more costly process and is only necessary in a minority of cases.
- Fine-tuning is most appropriate for companies with stringent data privacy requirements, such as banks, as it imbues the LLM with domain-specific knowledge.