Sign up to save tools and stay up to date with the latest in AI
bg
bg
1

LLMs Know More Than What They Say

Aug 20, 2024 - news.bensbites.com
The article discusses the use of latent space techniques to improve the accuracy of AI application evaluations. The authors argue that their approach, called Latent Space Readout (LSR), is more sample efficient and easily customizable than traditional fine-tuning methods. LSR can be used for hallucination detection and numeric grading of custom evaluation criteria, and can be configured with as few as 30-50 examples of human feedback. The authors also highlight that LSR can be used to improve the accuracy of automated, model-based evaluations, and can be easily updated to work with different base models.

The authors further illustrate the advantages of LSR using examples from the HaluBench benchmark and the CNN/DailyMail news summarization dataset. They show that LSR can boost hallucination detection accuracy and fit human feedback on numeric scoring rubrics in a very sample efficient manner. They also argue that LSR can provide better accuracy at lower cost compared to frontier models. The authors conclude by emphasizing the importance of sample efficiency in productionizing custom evaluations and the role of their platform, Log10, in supporting developers throughout this process.

Key takeaways:

  • Log10's research has led to the development of a novel application of latent space techniques to GenAI application evaluations, offering benefits such as rapid customization, easy updates, configurability, and support for numeric scoring.
  • Latent space readout (LSR) can boost evaluation accuracy over using the same LLM as a Judge in standard approaches via prompting, and even over frontier models for certain evaluation types.
  • LSR is not dependent on collecting hundreds to thousands of human feedback examples and works effectively when the amount of human feedback is small, with performance comparable to fine tuning on the target evaluation task.
  • Latent space approaches are able to fit human feedback on numeric scoring rubrics in a very sample efficient manner, providing better accuracy at lower cost compared to frontier models.
View Full Article

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!