The article also highlights concerns from various experts about the Llama-2 license. Stefano Maffulli, the OSI's executive director, points out that the license restricts commercial use and requires permission for certain uses, which contradicts the principles of open source. Karen Sadler, executive director at the Software Freedom Conservancy, also criticizes the license for its limitations on the number of users and its vaguely defined prohibited behaviors.
Key takeaways:
- Meta's Llama 2 AI model is being criticized for not being truly open source, despite claims from the company.
- Experts argue that the Llama 2 Community License Agreement has restrictions on commercial use, which goes against the Open Source Definition.
- There is concern that the license's language could be subjectively applied, potentially limiting its use.
- There was no public drafting or comment process for the Llama 2 license, which is typically necessary for introducing a new license.