The lawsuit, filed in San Jose, California, seeks unspecified damages for breach of contract and violations of California's unfair competition law, along with $1,000 per person for violations of the federal Stored Communications Act. It represents LinkedIn Premium customers who used InMail messages and whose data was allegedly shared for AI training before the policy update. LinkedIn has denied the allegations, stating that the claims are false and without merit.
Key takeaways:
```html
- LinkedIn has been sued by Premium customers for allegedly disclosing private messages to third parties without consent to train AI models.
- The lawsuit claims LinkedIn quietly introduced a privacy setting in August allowing users to opt in or out of data sharing, and updated its privacy policy in September to include AI training usage.
- The complaint accuses LinkedIn of attempting to minimize scrutiny and legal fallout by discreetly updating its privacy policy and settings.
- The lawsuit seeks damages for breach of contract, privacy violations, and violations of California's unfair competition law and the federal Stored Communications Act.