The case follows other similar lawsuits against OpenAI, including from comedian Sarah Silverman and U.S. novelists. The legal disputes revolve around whether AI's data-mining of internet content for its responses constitutes copyright infringement. If found guilty, OpenAI could face the destruction of its infringing articles and hefty financial penalties. The case could set a precedent for copyright law in the context of AI, with legal experts suggesting the "fair use doctrine" may be invoked as a defense.
Key takeaways:
- The New York Times is considering legal action against OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, over alleged copyright infringement.
- The Times is concerned that ChatGPT, which creates text based on the paper's original reporting, is becoming a direct competitor.
- If OpenAI is found to have violated copyrights, it could face fines up to $150,000 for each infringement and may be ordered to destroy ChatGPT's dataset.
- Other copyright holders, including comedian Sarah Silverman and Getty Images, have also filed lawsuits against AI companies for similar reasons.