The situation highlights the broader tension between media companies and AI firms over the use of copyrighted material. While AI companies argue that their use of publicly available data falls under "fair use," the legal landscape remains uncertain. In the UK, prominent artists are advocating for legislation requiring explicit consent for using their works in AI training, a move that some industry leaders warn could stifle the AI sector in the country.
Key takeaways:
- The New York Times has signed a licensing deal with Amazon to allow its editorial content to be used in Amazon's AI platforms.
- Similar licensing agreements have been made by other media companies with AI firms, but legal battles over copyright infringement are ongoing.
- OpenAI offers publishers between $1 million to $5 million annually for content licensing, while Apple has offered $50 million multiyear deals.
- The AI industry's reliance on "fair use" for training models is under legal scrutiny, with potential implications for its future depending on court rulings.