The article also presents counterarguments, such as the anthropomorphizing of AI, the distraction from human welfare, and the premature hiring of AI welfare overseers. It also discusses the possibility that AGI might not need human concern for its welfare, as it could take care of itself. However, it concludes by suggesting that the welfare of AI will be inextricably linked with the welfare of humankind, thus making it a topic worthy of consideration.
Key takeaways:
- The article discusses the rising attention to AI welfare, with some arguing that as artificial general intelligence (AGI) nears attainment, we should be considering the well-being and overall welfare of AI.
- There are contrasting opinions on this topic, with some believing it is necessary while others dismiss it as the arrival of AGI is not close to practical reality.
- The article also mentions the trend of hiring AI welfare overseers, who would be responsible for putting together AI welfare codes of conduct and methods, working with employees on how to properly treat AI, and ensuring the company abides by any new AI welfare laws.
- However, there are concerns about this trend, including that it promotes the anthropomorphizing of AI, distracts from the welfare of humans in light of AI that can go off the rails, and that it might be more beneficial to focus on hiring and retaining AI ethics and AI safety personnel.