Experts warn that if The Times wins, it could have catastrophic consequences for the AI industry, as many language models have trained on datasets of questionable provenance. A win could lead to a flood of similar claims from content creators. OpenAI has argued that it would be impossible to build AI products like ChatGPT without using copyrighted material. The company has previously defended itself against similar lawsuits, arguing that plaintiffs misconceive the scope of copyright and fail to consider exceptions like fair use.
Key takeaways:
- OpenAI and Microsoft are facing a lawsuit from The New York Times, accusing them of using its journalism to build products without permission or payment.
- The lawsuit could have significant implications for the AI industry, as it could open the door for similar claims from other content creators.
- OpenAI has defended itself, arguing that The Times is 'intentionally manipulating prompts' to make ChatGPT reproduce the articles.
- Alex Connock, a senior fellow at Oxford University's Saïd Business School, suggests that if The Times wins, it could lead to 'catastrophic' consequences for the AI industry, potentially causing damage on an industry-wide scale.