Senator Wiener defended the bill, stating it only asks large AI labs to test their models for catastrophic safety risk, a practice they should already be committed to. He also dismissed concerns about AI talent leaving the state, as the law would apply to any companies conducting business in California, regardless of their location. Despite the opposition, the bill has received support from two national security experts.
Key takeaways:
- OpenAI is opposing a California bill, SB 1047, that would impose new safety requirements on AI companies, arguing it could stifle innovation and should be regulated at the federal level instead.
- The bill requires AI companies to take steps to prevent their models from causing "critical harm" and to disclose a statement of compliance to California's attorney general. Non-compliance could result in lawsuits and civil penalties.
- Many major tech companies, startups, and venture capitalists have also opposed the bill, fearing it could drive AI companies out of California and hinder tech innovation in the state.
- California State Senator Scott Wiener, who introduced the bill, defended it, stating it is a reasonable measure that aligns with foreseeable AI risks and should be enacted.