OpenAI, in its defense, stated that it is bound by U.S. laws to preserve its training data due to ongoing copyright disputes, including a case with The New York Times. The company also denied ANI's allegations, suggesting ANI attempted to manipulate ChatGPT by using its own articles as prompts. This case is part of a broader trend of copyright disputes against AI companies, with content creators challenging the use of their work in AI training. The Delhi High Court is set to hear the case on 28 January, and its outcome could impact how India handles AI-related copyright issues and the accountability of foreign companies for alleged violations involving Indian content.
Key takeaways:
- OpenAI argues it cannot delete training data used for ChatGPT due to U.S. legal obligations, despite a lawsuit from ANI in India.
- OpenAI claims Indian courts lack jurisdiction as it has no physical presence or servers in India.
- ANI accuses OpenAI of copyright infringement, alleging ChatGPT reproduces its articles, harming its business.
- The case highlights growing copyright disputes against AI companies and could impact how India addresses AI-related copyright issues.