The U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein had previously ruled that OpenAI and Microsoft could be responsible for inducing users to infringe on the Times's copyrights, citing numerous examples of ChatGPT producing material from the Times's articles. OpenAI COO Brad Lightcap condemned the lawsuit's demand to retain user data indefinitely, arguing it conflicts with privacy commitments and norms. OpenAI is appealing the order to prioritize user trust and privacy, while The New York Times has yet to comment on the appeal.
Key takeaways:
- OpenAI plans to appeal a court decision requiring them to preserve ChatGPT output data indefinitely at The New York Times' request.
- The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft for allegedly using its articles without permission to train their language models.
- OpenAI argues that the lawsuit's demands conflict with user privacy commitments and set a bad precedent.
- The case has sparked a conversation about "AI privilege," comparing interactions with AI to those with lawyers or doctors.