The article underscores the gap between AI hype and reality, questioning claims of OpenAI's progress towards AGI. While o1 managed some correct groupings, its overall performance was inconsistent, revealing that AI can excel at regurgitating known information but falters with new challenges. This incident suggests that if OpenAI has made strides towards AGI, it remains undisclosed, as current models like o1 do not exhibit the reasoning capabilities expected of such advanced systems.
Key takeaways:
- OpenAI's o1 model struggled with solving the New York Times' Connections word game, highlighting limitations in its reasoning abilities.
- The AI model made some correct groupings but also produced bizarre combinations, indicating challenges with novel queries.
- The performance of o1 raises questions about the current state of artificial general intelligence (AGI) claims by OpenAI.
- The article suggests that if OpenAI has achieved AGI, it is not yet publicly evident based on the model's performance in this test.