The author criticizes Qualcomm and Microsoft for their new AI/Copilot PCs, suggesting that the companies have intentionally prevented independent reviews of their new SoC in the AI/Copilot PCs. The author argues that the x86 emulation is poor and that the companies are hiding this fact. The article also criticizes the AI PCs, suggesting that they offer little advantage over current silicon and that Microsoft is pushing them primarily to reduce datacenter costs. The author also raises concerns about the security of Qualcomm silicon, suggesting that it can be easily hacked. The article also mentions ongoing legal issues between Qualcomm and ARM over the Nuvia IP that Qualcomm purchased. The author concludes by suggesting that Qualcomm's decision to offer a free TV with the purchase of an AI PC indicates a lack of confidence in the product.
Key takeaways:
- Qualcomm and Microsoft have been accused of preventing independent reviews of their new SoC in the AI/Copilot PCs, suggesting they may have something to hide.
- The x86 emulation on the new devices is reportedly poor, which could be a significant issue as x86 compatibility is a key marketing message from both companies.
- Microsoft's push for AI PCs is seen as a way for the company to reduce datacenter costs, despite the lack of significant benefits for the user.
- Qualcomm's new silicon is considered unsafe to deploy due to intentional remote hardware backdoors, making the devices potentially insecure.