The AI-generated articles on Quartz have been criticized for their inaccuracies and misleading information, including incorrect attribution of sources. The publication's AI system has been described as a traffic-driven initiative by G/O Media, prioritizing clicks over accurate journalism. This approach has led to frustration among the company's human journalists, who are concerned about the reputational damage caused by these AI-generated articles. Despite reaching out, G/O Media has not responded to inquiries about the issue.
Key takeaways:
- Quartz's AI-generated articles contain significant factual errors, such as misrepresenting the reasons behind NASA astronauts' extended stay on the ISS.
- The AI-generated content incorrectly credits sources, attributing Associated Press reporting to a random employee from GV Wire.
- The AI-generated article inaccurately describes the astronauts' spacewalk experience, omitting crucial details and context.
- G/O Media's use of AI for content generation is seen as a traffic-driven strategy, despite the reputational harm and misinformation it spreads.