The piece further critiques the use of AI in generating content, suggesting it could lead to a flood of low-value or even bigoted content. It also criticizes the quality of AI outputs, comparing Google's AI efforts to Kodak's failure to adapt to digital photography. The article ends with a dystopian vision of AI replacing human interaction on social media, leading to an endless cycle of content creation and consumption without human involvement.
Key takeaways:
- AI generated text content is being used in various fields, including advertising and social media engagement.
- There are concerns about the quality and bias of AI generated content, with some arguing that it often lacks value and can perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
- Many believe that AI's potential to generate and respond to social media posts could lead to a future where human involvement is minimal.
- There are concerns about the use of user data in training AI, with some arguing that if you aren't paying for a service, you're likely the product.