The court found that ROSS's use of the copyrighted material, acquired through LegalEase Solutions, was commercial and not transformative, thus failing to qualify as fair use. This ruling underscores the importance of navigating copyright laws carefully when employing AI technologies, as it sets a precedent that could affect both large and small companies in their approach to using such technologies responsibly.
Key takeaways:
- Federal appellate Judge Stephanos Bibas ruled that ROSS Intelligence infringed on 2,443 headnotes in Thomson Reuters' Westlaw database.
- The ruling was made in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
- ROSS's use of the copyrighted content was deemed commercial and not transformative, thus not qualifying as fair use.
- This ruling could significantly impact how companies use AI technology responsibly.