In a debate prompt, the new Bard showed improvement by including more jargon, but the ChatGPT responses were more comprehensible for a wide audience. The conclusion was that ChatGPT managed to explain both sides of the debate well without relying on confusing jargon, giving it the win in this comparison.
Key takeaways:
- The article compares the performance of the new Gemini-powered Bard chatbot by Google with OpenAI's ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 Turbo using a set of carefully designed prompts.
- The comparison tests included generating original dad jokes and writing a 5-line debate between a fan of PowerPC processors and a fan of Intel processors, circa 2000.
- Both AI models struggled with originality in generating dad jokes, with most jokes being found verbatim or with minor rewordings through a quick Google search.
- In the debate prompt, the new Gemini-powered Bard used more technical jargon while ChatGPT focused on a more generalized "power vs. compatibility" argument, making it more comprehensible for a wide audience.