The controversy has sparked a wave of reactions from the public, experts, and the media, with many siding with Johansson and arguing that using a voice so similar to hers without explicit consent was unethical. Others defended OpenAI, pointing out the legal permissions they had obtained. The case has broader implications for the AI industry, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines and ethical standards in AI development, and serves as a reminder of the importance of consent and the ethical use of personal attributes in AI development.
Key takeaways:
- Scarlett Johansson expressed shock and anger over OpenAI’s use of a voice resembling hers in their ChatGPT software, sparking a controversy about ethics and legality in AI.
- OpenAI responded by stating that they had obtained all necessary legal permissions for the voice used and did not intend to mislead the public, but they paused the use of the voice in their products.
- The public and experts had varied reactions, with some siding with Johansson and arguing against unauthorized use of personal attributes, while others defended OpenAI, pointing out the legal permissions they had obtained.
- The controversy has broader implications for the AI industry, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines and ethical standards in AI development, and the importance of consent and the ethical use of personal attributes in AI.