The article also discusses the ongoing debate over AI regulation in the US, with some tech leaders advocating for more regulation while others, like Levie, caution against it. It mentions a proposed bill by Representative Adam Schiff that would require AI companies to disclose copyrighted works used in their training data sets. The article concludes by noting that despite the push for AI regulation, Congress has yet to pass comprehensive legislation addressing the issue.
Key takeaways:
- Box CEO Aaron Levie expressed skepticism about the need for heavy regulation of AI, arguing that it's too early to consider restraints like forcing companies to submit large language models to government-approved AI cops.
- Levie's stance contrasts with other Silicon Valley AI leaders who are calling for regulation, but he notes that there is no consensus on what the laws should actually say.
- Despite the push for AI regulation, Levie believes that a sweeping AI bill in the US is unlikely due to lack of coordination.
- The White House has issued a non-binding Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, but turning these suggestions into binding law is a complex task, highlighting the difficulty of regulating new technology.