the art of programming and why i won't use llm

The author discusses the increasing use of Language Learning Models (LLMs) in coding, stating that while many praise their productivity-boosting capabilities, he believes their effectiveness is overstated. He argues that even if LLMs were as effective as claimed, he would not use them, as he views programming as an art form, a means of self-expression, and using LLMs would be akin to automating the creative process.

The author expresses disappointment at the trend of automating programming and delegating it to LLMs, which he likens to a "black box." He laments the apparent decline in programmers who find joy in the process of coding and care about going beyond just making things work. He clarifies that his critique is not a judgment on those who don't find programming enjoyable or who just want things to work, but rather an expression of his disappointment.

Key takeaways:

The author believes that the effectiveness of llms in coding is vastly overblown and does not see himself using it in any meaningful capacity.
Programming is seen as an art form by the author, a way of self-expression and creativity.
The author compares using llm to write code to asking an artist to paint for you, arguing that it takes away the joy and personal touch of the process.
The author expresses disappointment in the trend of automating programming and fears that those who truly care about the art of programming are becoming a dying breed.

the art of programming and why i won't use llm

Key takeaways:

Comments (0)

Newsletter