1
Feature Story
The Right Not to Be Subjected to AI Profiling Based on Publicly Available Data—Privacy and the Exceptionalism of AI Profiling
Jun 06, 2024 · link.springer.comThe article also presents three cases of AI profiling based on social media data to illustrate the contexts in which AI-driven mental health profiling may be conducted. It further develops three arguments in favor of a right to privacy specifically in relation to the use of personal data: the social pressure argument, the 'open future' argument, and the stigmatization argument. The article ends with reflections on the proposed arguments and suggests an agenda for future research.
Key takeaways
- The article argues that individuals should have a right not to be subjected to AI profiling based on publicly available data without their explicit informed consent.
- The article develops three basic arguments for a right to protection of personal data trading on the notions of social control and stigmatization.
- The article argues that AI profiling poses a unique threat to individuals, making them more exposed to social control and stigmatization than other types of data processing.
- The article concludes that the EU General Data Protection Regulation does not ensure that individuals have a right not to be AI profiled based on publicly available data.