However, some educators have expressed concerns about the use of AI for grading, especially for assignments requiring subjective evaluations. While the AI tool can accurately determine whether a coding project meets certain requirements, some teachers worry it may not be able to provide the same level of feedback and guidance as a human teacher. Despite these concerns, Code.org believes that AI tools could be increasingly used to help grade student work, particularly in technical subjects like computer science.
Key takeaways:
- Code.org and the Piech Lab at Stanford University have developed an AI teaching assistant that can grade coding projects, reducing the time teachers spend on this task by about half.
- The tool's assessments of student work have so far closely matched those of experienced computer science teachers, and Code.org is now inviting 300 more teachers to test the tool.
- While some educators see AI as a useful tool for handling time-consuming tasks like grading, others are concerned about the potential loss of subjective judgement and personalized feedback that human teachers provide.
- Despite the potential benefits of AI grading tools, teachers like Aimee Knaus stress the importance of human oversight and control, arguing that AI should not be trusted over human knowledge.