The article also emphasizes the need for engineers to understand the lawyers' work processes and requirements, and to incorporate these insights into the design of AI tools. It concludes by stating that the future of legal AI is promising, but requires open and honest dialogue between engineers and lawyers to develop products that are not just technically sophisticated, but also practical and useful in the legal context.
Key takeaways:
- Software engineers and lawyers often have different approaches to problem-solving, with engineers favoring iterative approaches and lawyers aiming to get it right the first time.
- As generative AI tools are developed, engineers need to communicate the assumptions and capabilities of these tools to lawyers, and how they will evolve over time.
- Lawyers need guidance from engineers on how generative AI works and how to structure effective prompts for large language models.
- The future of legal AI depends on the ability of attorneys and engineers to communicate effectively, understand each other's perspectives, and build trust.