The government, however, argues that a more open system could prevent international developers from bypassing UK content restrictions and support the growth of British AI. Critics, including members of parliament and the House of Lords, have compared the proposal to allowing shoplifting and argue that it misunderstands existing copyright law. The debate highlights a tension between fostering AI innovation and protecting creative rights, with calls for amendments to ensure fair compensation for creators.
Key takeaways:
```html
- Creative industries, including writers, musicians, and publishers, oppose the Labour government's plan for a copyright exemption that would allow AI companies to train on published works without explicit permission.
- The Creative Rights in AI Coalition argues that existing copyright laws should be respected and enforced, and that AI developers should seek permission and agree on licenses with rights holders.
- High-profile creatives like Paul McCartney and Kate Bush have joined a petition against unlicensed use of creative works for AI training, highlighting the threat to creators' livelihoods.
- The government argues that a restrictive regime could disadvantage UK AI developers and the creative industries, but critics claim the proposed exemption misunderstands existing copyright law.