Sign up to save tools and stay up to date with the latest in AI
bg
bg
1

We are not creating the

Nov 30, 2023 - prahladyeri.github.io
The article discusses the author's concerns about the current direction of artificial intelligence (AI) development. The author argues that while past technological advancements like the typewriter and the printing press were utilitarian, serving to enhance human capabilities, AI is being used primarily to replace human labor, particularly in creative fields. The author questions the societal benefit of this trend, arguing that AI should be a tool, not a master, and that its current use is devaluing human creativity and potential.

The author also warns of the potential dystopian future where AI takes over all creative tasks, leading to a decline in human skills and curiosity. They express concern about the societal division between the few who control AI and the many who are left with menial tasks. The author ends by questioning whether we are already seeing signs of this dystopian society.

Key takeaways:

  • The author argues that current forms of AI are not utilitarian and primarily serve to automate jobs, which they believe is not beneficial for society.
  • The author suggests that AI is being used inappropriately to replace creative jobs, while menial tasks are still performed by humans, which they see as an insult to human potential.
  • The author expresses concern that human skills and creativity will diminish if machines take over all creative tasks, using the decline in general knowledge since the advent of Google as an example.
  • The author fears the creation of a dystopian society divided between the few who control AI and the many who perform menial tasks to support the AI ecosystem.
View Full Article

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!