Sign up to save tools and stay up to date with the latest in AI
bg
bg
1

Why data will always be a precious commodity in the AI world

Feb 02, 2024 - fastcompany.com
The New York Times' lawsuit against OpenAI over the use of its journalism to train the tech company's large language model (LLM) could signal a shift in the relationship between Big Tech and content creators. The lawsuit raises questions about data usage and whether companies can claim "fair use" when using this data. OpenAI and ChatGPT require a wide range of data, including proprietary and non-copyright work, to strengthen their models. The company has admitted that it would be impossible to train LLMs like ChatGPT without access to copyrighted work.

This case is one of many involving intellectual property implications of AI, with multiple lawsuits filed claiming that the training process for AI programs infringes upon copyrights. Content creators like Michael Chabon and Sarah Silverman have initiated suits against Meta, and there are proposed class action lawsuits against Alphabet Inc., Stability AI, and Midjourney. As AI use continues to grow, there will be increasing pressure to resolve these copyright issues, and cases centered on AI-related accuracy, safety, and discrimination are likely to rise. Companies using AI tools are advised to exercise care in tracking and monitoring their use of the tech.

Key takeaways:

  • The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI over the tech company’s use of the newspaper’s content to train its large language model (LLM), which could indicate a shift in the relationship between Big Tech and content creators.
  • At the core of the lawsuit is the question of data and whether companies behind LLMs can claim “fair use” in using that data, including both proprietary and non-copyright work.
  • OpenAI has admitted that it could not train LLMs like ChatGPT without access to copyrighted work, emphasizing the importance of high-quality training data for AI tools.
  • There has been a rise in lawsuits claiming the training process for AI programs infringes upon copyrights, and as AI use continues to grow, there will be increasing pressure to resolve these copyright issues.
View Full Article

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!